"I saw in relation to the .daily,' Daniel 8:12, that the word .sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment-hour cry" (EW 74, 75). Proponents of Conradi's view say this is an "imperfect statement," the author's intent was to uphold the "time."
However, could the Lord have had a deeper purpose in adding the apparently irrelevant details of this vision in order to safeguard the interpretation against the Antiochus Epiphanes view and the consequent abandonment of 1844 and the sanctuary doctrine?
If so, the statement can hardly be considered "imperfect."
"The past fifty years [written 1905] have not dimmed one jot or principle of our faith. … Not a word is changed or denied. That which the Holy Spirit testified to as truth after the passing of the time, in our great disappointment, is the solid foundation of truth … [that] made us what we are-Seventh-day Adventists" (Special Testimonies, Series B, No. 7, pp. 57, 58). Could this be a comment on "the daily"?
A. "Almost imperceptibly the customs of heathenism found their way into the Christian church … restrained for a time by the fierce persecutions which the church endured under paganism. But … in the early part of the fourth century … the work of corruption rapidly increased. Paganism, while appearing to be vanquished, became the conqueror … Her doctrines, ceremonies, and superstitions were incorporated into the faith and worship of the professed followers of Christ.
"This compromise between paganism and Christianity resulted in the development of .the man of sin' foretold in prophecy. … That gigantic system of false religion is a masterpiece of Satan's power" (GC 49, 50).
B. "In the sixth century the papacy had become firmly established. … Paganism had given place to the papacy" (p. 54).
Does statement (A) comment on the activity implied in Daniel's use of rum in 8:11, and (B) the taking away or replacement of the political, military power of paganism by the papacy in Daniel's use of SUR in 11:13? If so, we have firm support here for the pioneers' view, and an unintended demonstration of remarkable consistency in Ellen White's extensive writings over half a century from Early Writings (1850) to The Great Controversy (1911).